Listen to article being read here
The experimental physicist and biomaterial researcher Dr Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test rods under the microscope and analysed their ingredients. Antonietta M. Gatti, Ph.D. is also the coordinator of the Italian Institute of Technology’s Project of Nanoecotoxicology, called INESE.
The irritating result: the PCR test swabs are made of hard materials and contain a variety of (nano) particles made of silver, aluminium, titanium, glass fibres ect, many of which are undeclared in the package leaflet. When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation, the scientist said. ENT doctors told 2020News that they are finding more hardened mucous membranes in people who are often tested for SARS-CoV-2. No longer intact mucous membranes can no longer fulfil their task of repelling viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways, as the pediatrician Eugen Janzen also reports. The germs thus penetrate into the airways without any immune filter. Particularly problematic in this context: the warm breath moisture under the masks is the ideal breeding ground for germs of all kinds.
Prof. Gatti has analyzed in the laboratory various types of smear swabs used for the collection of human organic material for PCR diagnostics using electron microscopy (ESEM and EDS) to check the morphology and chemical composition.
For Prof. Gatti, a “cotton” stick from Biocomma in Shenzhen, China, could not determine whether it was made of carbon or cotton. The dirt in the product consisted of calcium corbonate, stainless steel or silicates.
A brush-like test stick from Manta, China, had a variety of broken fibers. Carbon, oxygen, silicone, zirconium, sulfur, aluminum, titanium and sodium were found as components of the sample.
Another swab from Biocomma seemed to consist of fiberglass or at least a coating of fiberglass. Components were carbon, oxygen, aluminum, silicone and titanium. It could not be ruled out that an additional coating consisted of organic materials.
The tip of the applicator of another test stick – FLOQSwabs® – was coated with short nylon® fibers arranged vertically. FLOQSwabs® have no inner core to enclose the sample.
Prof. Gatti writes: “The company explains that the fiber core is made of nylon with a coating of a patented material that turns out to be silicate-zirconium titanium in the analysis. This coating makes the fiber harder so that it is able to tear the mucous membrane. There is a possibility that the pressure applied to the smear maneuvers may break some fibers that remain in situ. If this is the case, they can cause a foreign body reaction that can damage the mucous membrane in such a way that breathing and speech are hindered.”
According to Prof. Gatti’s analysis, the small white dots on the image of the swab neck are silver nanoparticles: “Silver is a material that is not declared in the manufacturer’s data sheet.”
Prof. Gatti comes to the following conclusions:
“The “porcupine” swabs are made of hard fibers. If they scrape on the nasal mucosa, they can damage it, causing a bleeding lesion or, in any case, tissue trauma.
During the healing process of the mucous membrane, the broken fibers can penetrate the tissue without any possibility of removing them, thus causing the formation of a granuloma or fibrotic tissue, as happens with any foreign body.
The medical devices examined are not fully biocompatible and therefore do not meet the requirements of ISO 10993 and the tests required to obtain the CE mark.
- Some swabs are dangerous for the nasal-throat mucosa. The glass-like fibers, hard and brittle, can scratch the mucous membrane and produce lesions. Bleeding is an expression of the invasiveness of the test.
- Repeated tests with smears can cause chronic lesions. The release of fragments of brittle glass-like fibers can cause biological reactions such as granulomas and/or fibrosis of the tissue.
- These reductions pose a risk to the health of infants and children. If the tests are necessary, Prof. Gatti says, small and mild smears must be carried out in children.
Results from another independent test on PCR swabs in Slovakia.
In Slovakia, in an unnamed hospital laboratory from Bratislava, another independent lab test was done to determine the material on the PCR swab which determined Darpa patented hydrogel, lithium and nylon.
”After spawning a mixture of nylon fiber fragments, Darpa Hydrogel remains on the nasal mucosa under the pituitary and pineal gland along with lithium. This mixture immediately reacts with living structures to form crystals that are directionally oriented to the pineal gland, which has its own electromagnetic field. The shape of the crystals determines the type of hydrogel used. The crystals are conductive due to the lithium contained in it. The crystals can receive the signal from the transmitter to the cell and transmit signals from the cell to the transmitter. These are actually nano-antennas.”
‘‘Lithium is an element (reference to Li) that does not occur naturally in humans. It is highly toxic to the pineal gland influence. In low doses it blocks it and in higher doses it can completely destroy it. Aluminum and mercury also have toxic effects on the pineal gland, which are widely used in vaccines. The pineal gland produces serotonin (a hormone of happiness) and controls human biorhythms. It is crucial for higher brain activity (creativity, foresight, sixth sense, etc.) and for social interactions of man”.
”Darpa Hydrogel and lithium block and destroy the pineal gland and cause the thinking person to become a controllable biorobot. A hydrogel is a carrier of an active substance, its task is to get the substance into the body at a pre-desired place.” – Nutritruth.org
According to the medical research, Ivermectin, a nobel prize winning medicine, can be used to dissolve the hydrogel crystals. Interesting how Ivermectin has been so vehemently suppressed even though Dr Kory testified on its success rate of helping save lives of COVID patients, many other doctors attest to Ivermectin’s ability to prevent Covid symptoms getting worse.
This is why PCR tests despite their great erroneous false positives and lack of gold standard are a preference by the governments, instead of other antigen tests. If this isn’t disturbing enough, the tests also contain ethylene oxide, used as a pesticide in agriculture and causes cancer. These ingredients are not without reason. Not for safeguarding our health, rather causing more harm and destroying our natural mucosa membrane leaving us more susceptible to further viral infection, additionally it appears the hydrogel is causing blood clots in the blood vessels.
Sources and Credits
2020 News Translated from German to English
Thanks also to Doctor Peter Moloney Foundation on twitter, we pray your account is not taken down by Communist Big Tech for sharing this important information
Last photos credit to Slovakia hospital laboratory of unamed hospital in Bratislava and featured in -Analysis of test sticks from surface testing in the Slovak Republic –Nutritruth.org
Other scientific research on nanoparticles in non consented medical use links
Nanoparticles for nasal vaccination were developed over a decade ago
Nano emulsion-based intranasal drug delivery system of saquinavir mesylate for brain targeting. Mahajan HS, Mahajan MS, Nerkar PP, Agrawal A.Drug Deliv. 2014 Mar;21(2):148-54. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2013.838014. Epub 2013 Oct 16.PMID: 24128122
Hydrogel nanoparticles and nanocomposites for nasal drug/vaccine deliverySara Salatin 1 2, Jaleh Barar 1 3, Mohammad Barzegar-Jalali 3, Khosro Adibkia 3 4, Mitra Alami Milani 2 4, Mitra Jelvehgari 5 6Affiliations expandPMID: 27352214 DOI: 10.1007/s12272-016-0782-0https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27352214/
Nanoparticles for nasal vaccination. Csaba N, Garcia-Fuentes M, Alonso MJ.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009 Feb 27;61(2):140-57. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Dec 13.PMID: 19121350 Review.
Nanoparticulate systems for nasal delivery of drugs: a real improvement over simple systems?Illum L.J Pharm Sci. 2007 Mar;96(3):473-83. doi: 10.1002/jps.20718.PMID: 17117404
Pharmaceutical aspects of intranasal delivery of vaccines using particulate systems. Sharma S, Mukkur TK, Benson HA, Chen Y.J Pharm Sci. 2009 Mar;98(3):812-43. doi: 10.1002/jps.21493.PMID: 18661544 Review.
The application of mucoadhesive polymers in nasal drug delivery.Jiang L, Gao L, Wang X, Tang L, Ma J.Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2010 Mar;36(3):323-36. doi: 10.1080/03639040903170750.PMID: 19735210
Quality-by-Design-Based Development of n-Propyl-Gallate-Loaded Hyaluronic-Acid-Coated Liposomes for Intranasal Administration. Sabir F, Katona G, Pallagi E, Dobó DG, Akel H, Berkesi D, Kónya Z, Csóka I.Molecules. 2021 Mar 6;26(5):1429. doi: 10.3390/molecules26051429.PMID: 33800788 Free PMC article.
Interleukin-4-loaded hydrogel scaffold regulates macrophages polarization to promote bone mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation via TGF-β1/Smad pathway for repair of bone defect. Zhang J, Shi H, Zhang N, Hu L, Jing W, Pan J.Cell Prolif. 2020 Oct;53(10):e12907. doi: 10.1111/cpr.12907. Epub 2020 Sep 19.PMID: 32951298 Free PMC article.
Application of Nanopharmaceutics for Flibanserin Brain Delivery Augmentation Via the Nasal Route.Ahmed OAA, Fahmy UA, Badr-Eldin SM, Aldawsari HM, Awan ZA, Asfour HZ, Kammoun AK, Caruso G, Caraci F, Alfarsi A, Al-Ghamdi RA, Al-Ghamdi RA, Alhakamy NA.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Jun 29;10(7):1270. doi: 10.3390/nano10071270.PMID: 32610539 Free PMC article.
Opioid antagonists as potential therapeutics for ischemic stroke.Peyravian N, Dikici E, Deo S, Toborek M, Daunert S.Prog Neurobiol. 2019 Nov;182:101679. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101679. Epub 2019 Aug 6.PMID: 31398359 Free PMC article.
Stimulus-responsive polymeric nanogels as smart drug delivery systems. Hajebi S, Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M, Ahmadi S, Rabiee M, Roghani-Mamaqani H, Tahriri M, Tayebi L, Hamblin MR.Acta Biomater. 2019 Jul 1;92:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 May 13.
|Please feel free to add further science journal links below in the comments|
THE NUREMBERG CODE [from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military
Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg, October 1946–April 1949.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. G.P.O, 1949–1953.]
Dr Reiner Fuellmich and the class lawsuit against PCR test fraud:
Reiner Fuellmich ~ PCR test fraud lawsuit
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – Dr. Fuellmich:
DR. FUELLMICH – CORONA-SAMMELKLAGE (GERMAN) CORONA-SCANDAL:
BEN SWANN INTERVIEWS REINER FUELLMICH – SUEING THE FACT CHECKERS:
30TH SITTING CORONA COMMITTEE: PROF. HOCKERTZ, MRNA VACCINES CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE:
DER FALL DROSTEN – REINER FÜLLMICH:
Dr. Fuellmich – Is Dr. Drosten a fraud?