It is very difficult for the general public to differentiate between Science and Scientism, especially if one has no academic background in science. When we see a bunch of statistics and pictures of cells in a journal or news article, we are impressed without even understanding what we are looking at or being able to objectively analyse the data correctly. Scientism has been commonly used especially in the climate change debate, empirical science relies on concrete evidence in the form of long-term scientific data and accurate samples taken over a long period of time that don’t have any distortion or unclear error of margin. Furthermore, error of margin is addressed through a gold standard process. Whereas, scientism is the promotion of ”science” as a tool used by a group with an agenda to fulfil. They favour computer prediction models and databases filled with handpicked data, rather than randomised data, usually unrelated to the current experiment or topic, to make inaccurate predictions, to favour a nurtured outcome, ignoring margins of error, necessary for real objective scientific analysis, along with risk assessments and long-term safety tests and trials.
Obvious parallels can be seen with the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, John Hopkins University, one of Bill and Melinda Gate’s blessed beneficiaries, dished out wonderfully inaccurate computer modelled data predictions for the pandemic, which government decisions were based on.
”Unfortunately, in retrospect, COVID-19 anxiety can turn to COVID-19 disillusionment when the decisions made by policy makers are dictated by suspect low quality data and consequently by poorly performing models. One solution would be to compare predictions of models against emerging reality on a daily basis using prespecified metrics such as those analysed here. Models that are consistently poorly performing should carry less weight in shaping policy considerations.”– Vincent Chin et al. August 2020.
The same methods are being used with politicians, public health advisors and the global media are spinning scientism on which to base tyrannical lockdown regulations and economic restrictions in the guise of protecting public health. Meanwhile, the real doctors, scientists, immunologists, lawyers, nurses, and health workers who dare to speak out are ignored or slandered by mainstream media, called conspiracy theorists, and risk losing their jobs, reputations or practitioner licenses, being marginalised and slandered. The need for financial transparency to ensure trust in science and medicine has long been recognised, but this all ended in 2020. This is very dangerous territory, for when medicine and political governing are combined the consequences can be genocidal as we have seen with Dr Fuellmich’s ongoing work towards defending people’s medical freedoms with numerous Class Action lawsuits against global governments basing false scientism on PCR test fraud, Fact Checker Fraud, Nuremberg code violations and more. Kamran Abbasi, executive editor of BMJ, published a brilliant article on Scientism in Politics and Society titled- ”Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science” Abbasi said ”When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die”.
Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.
Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.-Kamran Abbasi, BJM
As we know, the experimental biological agent being peddled as a vaccine has been widely administered, it contains mercury, cancer cells, (mutagenic MRC-5 cell line), made from aborted human foetal cells and animal foetal cells, aluminium particles, polyethylene glycol (PEG), which 70 percent people have an allergic reaction to.
Listed other ingredients of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine include:
30 mcg of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA), encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 lipids (0.43 mg (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis (hexane-6,1-diyl) bis (2-hexyldecanoic),
.05 mg 2[polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide
.09 mg 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, and 0.2 mg
.01 potassium chloride
.01 mg monobasic potassium phosphate
.36 mg sodium chloride
.07 mg dibasic sodium phosphate dehydrate
6 mg sucrose
the diluent (.09 percent Sodium Chloride Injection) contributes an
additional 2.16 mg sodium chloride per dose.
So far, as revealed in the public domain Moderna’s vaccine, (mRNA-1273) specifically contains lipid nanoparticle dispersion containing an mRNA that encodes for the prefusion of stabilized spike protein 2019-nCoV. mRNA-1273 consists of an mRNA drug substance that is manufactured into LNPs composed of the proprietary ionizable lipid, SM-102, and 3 commercially available lipids, cholesterol, DSPC (1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine is a phosphatidylcholine with alkyl chain comprising 18 carbons), PEG2000 DMG (1,2-
One of the spike proteins in the mRNA gene therapy is called syncytin-1. Which is vital for the formation of human placenta in women. According to how the Covid jab works, the body will form an immune response against the spike protein, this means that the gene therapy is also programming the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility or miscarriages in pregnant women.
There are already published arguments against this being an ”unlikely outcome”, however, most of the journals that published some of these counter arguments, lack solid scientific data or they use models and databases that are not related to current test subjects, the conflict of interest is that they are mostly funded by or have some connecting conflict of interest with the pharmaceutical companies producing the covid shots. Therefore, they are astroturfed journals written by those who are paid by the pharmaceutical companies that are peddling the covid ”vaccine”. We only have biased published journal articles with no long-term studies on the long-term health implications or effects of this experimental gene therapy and biological agent. We are the test subjects and the long-term consequences are yet to be seen. Mainstream media moguls are also implicated, especially companies like the BBC who have been groomed for over a decade with frequent substantial financial sums from The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who are financially sponsoring most of the pro-vaccine main stream media publicity and institutes such as the NHI and WHO.
Most of the main stream media is controlled by a few news agencies owned by some of the world’s richest plutocrats who believe the world is overpopulated and who are heavily invested in the current narrative with large financial gains from vaccines, and other rich pickings from this pandemic. Reuters has published a number of articles claiming that the concerns with the syncytin-1 protein are unwarranted, a statement which isn’t founded on any clear unbiased science. Reuters and others have also illegally joined in the slandering and defamation of Dr Michael Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer, who courageously spoke out to warn people against the dangers of the Covid shot, knowing that there would be a fierce retaliation from the media and big pharma vaccine investors to destroy his reputation. Reuters is owned by The Woodbridge Company, which is owned by the Canadian based Thomson family who, like many of the other of the world’s richest plutocrats have increased their wealth tenfold during the Covid crisis. The last 12 months have been challenging for many, but not for Toronto’s richest family, it was a time of financial growth. The Thomson family, whose net worth currently sits at $39.6 billion, they made several billion more since April 2020, according to Forbes.
Forbes data for America’s more than 600 billionaires between March 18, and May 19, 2020, when most states were in lockdown, published that the net worth of America’s billionaires grew 15% just in a two-month period from $2.948 trillion to $3.382 trillion. The biggest gains were at the top of the billionaire pyramid, with the richest five billionaires Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffett, and Larry Ellison. Interestingly in those months Elon Musk launched over 40,000 5G satellites and had among the largest percentage gain of billionaires during those two months, seeing his net worth jump by 48% to $36 billion.
In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by 50 companies; whereas since 2011, 90% were controlled by just 6 companies and in 2017 the number was reduced to 5. These companies are Time, owned by Marc Benioff, Viacom, Warner owned by AT&T, owned by Bell Canada, Disney whose main shareholders and CEOs are Robert A. Iger, Christine M. McCarthy, Alan N. Braverman, Vanguard Group Inc., BlackRock Inc., Then there’s Murdoch’s News Corporation, well, we already know so much about Rupert Murdoch, who also bought National Geographic a few years ago, Bertelsmann of Germany (who own Penguin Random House), the largest news conglomerate, operating in about 50 countries around the world. In November 2020, Bertelsmann has acquired the American publisher Simon & Schuster from ViacomCBS for more than $2 billion. Most of these companies are controlled by the world’s richest people, who have enjoyed growing wealth just like the Thomson family, this is why you will continue to read the most biased stories in mainstream media to feed the world’s richest. Dr Peter Breggin said ‘whether you look at a Gates or a Bloomberg, Schwab, even the Koch family, if you look at the top 16 billionaires, every one of them, but one, has deep ties to China, making a huge amount of money in China’. Hence, we must consider the technocracy formed with those participating in censorship of truth and real science with a preference to scientism in mainstream media and on social medial.
So who are all those other people? If you look at the top companies that are shutting down virus information six companies Twitter, Facebook, Microsoft, Youtube, Google, Apple, they’re all connected to China, deeply connected to China.
”They all are deeply connected to making money off the virus, even the Lancet is deeply involved with WHO and with China- protecting China, they set up a commission to investigate China before WHO did ,and they put the same echo health guy on that that who did, so we’ve got the (astroturfed), journals we’ve got the agencies of all kinds, and they’re deep, this all goes back to this connection between the United States and China’– Dr. Peter R. Breggin M.D.
We are the guinea-pigs, therefore the current adverse health reactions and observations are being experienced as this article is written, by people who have had the covid shot, since its roll out, the Yellow card reports from the UK, are exponentially increasing above 179,257, its unclear what the UK reported deaths are, its above 400, although, mainstream media and fact checkers censor a lot of these deaths. The same with US vaccine related deaths, the pattern is when they are published in news stories, they always report that the death is not because the person received the COVID shot, even before an autopsy has taken place, they will say its due to an undetected health implication, or they make the victim’s family say that they still recommend people to take the ”vaccine”, this is the template used in most news media reports on vaccine related deaths. In Europe, there are 3,964 reported deaths from the experimental jab and 162,610 vaccine injuries. In the United States the CDC reports are as follows, 2,050 deaths and 474,600 vaccine injuries.
Men who have had the jab have also reported their sperm count to significantly decrease, another strange phenomena reported by Chloe Angeline a Women’s Health specialist is that women who have not even had the jab, are discovering that their menstrual cycles are being disrupted because they are around people who have had the Covid shot. Please watch this moving warning by Chloe Angeline, a specialist in Holistic Women’s Health.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Shares Sequence with a Human Protein Syncytin-1
”Syncytin-1 is a protein that functions for placental development and therefore is essential for fertility. Fifteen years ago, it was proposed that a synthetic Syncytin-1 vaccine could be developed as a contraceptive
that would work to produce antibodies against human Syncytin-1.59 It is proposed by some doctors that the Pfizer COVID vaccine may elicit an antibody response against Syncythin-1 and cause infertility because
of a similar or shared amino acid sequence in the spike protein of SARSCoV-2 and the Syncythin-1 placental protein. Pharmaceutically sponsored fact-checkers, and Pfizer employed virologists were quick to
discount such an idea as “unlikely”.
They claim that this amino acid sequence is too short for the immune system to meaningfully confuse it with this important placental protein. However unlikely, if this later proves true for some susceptible women,
then that could cause infertility of an unspecified duration. Consider that scientific consensus is not 100 percent sure these similar amino acid sequences will cause Syncythin-1 antibodies to be produced. The role of retroviral proteins, especially syncytins, in the trophoblastic fusion process and placental morphogenesis were only identified and hypothesized about 20 years ago. There is still much to learn, and much we still do not know about similar amino acid sequences and their effect on human physiology. Thus, this issue warrants further research, and until then we should proceed with caution and assume that it may possibly cause public harm‘‘- Dr. James Odell, OMD, ND, L.Ac.
Some try to back up their arguments with referencing The Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to input sequences and compare them to known reference sequences to see if there is identity (homology), however as the current consequences are unknown, there are no known results in BLAST, people can use all the modelling data they like but as Dr James Odell states, scientific consensus is not 100 percent sure these similar amino acid sequences will cause Syncythin-1 antibodies to be produced and that misinformation is being given to the public to confuse people with Scientism, for example, ”They claim that this amino acid sequence is too short for the immune system to meaningfully confuse it with this important placental protein”. No database or computer modelling sequence can predict the current physiological consequences of this experimental gene therapy, that no one will understand the long-term health consequences of until we see the impact on the health of all those who have partaken in this global medical gene therapy experiment.
There is a transparency crisis in national and global governance due to the plutocratic trickledown of Investors and those pulling strings in News Media, in Government, health ministers and those in power are able to ignore or cherry pick science, according to their financial needs, political gain, and who indulge in nepotism practices which have become commonplace during the pandemic.
Due to a lack of awareness of how unregulated yet heavily influenced health policy making is, the fact is, its very influenced by the pharmaceutical stakeholders using scientism, and who have driven political decision making of health care policies without public consent or knowledge. The consequences of which will be responsible for more detrimental long-term health problems and more deaths than the actual COVID-19 virus. There needs to be full public disclosure of competing interests from government, medical corporations, politicians, media moguls, pharmaceutically funded scientific journals, health advisers, and the technocrats, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about Health policies, decision making systems and processes which needs to include 100 percent democratic interactive public consultation on health policies, for it is the people and tax payers who should have the first and final say in our health freedom and human rights choices, not the political stakeholders, technocrats, plutocrats or pharmaceutical companies.
Vaccine Injuries and adverse reactions
Join the support and information group for COVID Vaccine Victims deaths and Vaccine Injuries on Telegram
Vaccine providers are supposed to report adverse events that occur after vaccinations to VAERS but vaccinated persons who experienced the reaction or a family member also can file a report if a health care
provider does not do it. According to one government funded study in 2011, fewer than one
percent of all vaccine reactions are reported to VAERS. Report vaccine side effects to the FDA/CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). The VAERS toll-free number is
1-800-822-7967 or report online to https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html and include ‘Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA’ in the first line of box #18 of the report form.
Scientists launch study to find out if COVID-19 vaccines are causing period changes after hundreds of women notice irregularities
Bioregulatory Medicine Institute -COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines by Dr. James Odell, OMD, ND, L.Ac
A case study in model failure? COVID-19 daily deaths and ICU bed utilisation predictions in New York state. Published: by Vincent Chin, Noelle I. Samia, Roman Marchant, Ori Rosen, John P. A. Ioannidis, Martin A. Tanner & Sally Cripps. European Journal of Epidemiology volume 35, pages733–742(2020)