Effects of 5G on Human Health


When 240 doctors and scientists signed against 5G in Europe and 123,000 doctors, nurses, scientists and medical professionals from Physicians against 5G  globally resist 5G towers and systems being launched and have documented proof and evidence and already warned the public against the effects of 5G and 6G cell phone towers, it cannot be dismissed as a ”conspiracy theory” by the media or by those who are too lazy to read the hard evidence that these doctors and scientists have read to self educate.

The effects on humans are autoimmune problems, cytokines self attacking the immune system and other cells, digestive problems, muscle fatigue, motor skill problems, inflammation of the brain, and nervous system, cancer, dizzyness, nausea, headaches, internal bleeding, dry cough, respiratory problems, asthma, pneumonia, sore throat, insomnia, anxiety, depression, disrupted brainwave states and melatonin production and disrupted endocrine systems.

Telecommunications and the Military Complex are heating up the Ionosphere with high frequencies generated from HAARP, Gwen Towers and 5G in the range of 60–100 GigaHz, and 6G will be in the range of 100 Gigahertz (GHz) to 3 terahertz (THz). Not only do these frequencies affect climate change but microwaves frequencies can have a powerful effect on our brain waves, 6G will be a complete intrusion to the human brain and human mind, to the point of AI intrusion and manipulation.


The US Army and School of Aerospace Medicine published several volumes of hundreds of published peer reviewed papers with the results of microwave technology on biological tissue and organs, including human examples, In September 1974. The results of several hundred sick military experiments on animals which were released as findings in Several Volumes, Each volume comprises of several hundred military funded experiments.
Military and Scientists knew very well, over forty five years ago, after experimenting hundreds of times with microwave radiation on animals and people, using pulses and ranges of exposure  up to  2.45 MHz /4 MHz range, and S band waves and beyond 150-10,000 MHz. The documented effects in over several hundred scientific journal papers include negatively damage living biological tissues,  heart problems,  brain damage, cataracts,  abnormal DNA changes and damage,  cell damage, changes in the cerebral cortex, changes in EEG brainwave patterns, changes in behaviour.
One 1972 paper states ”personnel should not be exposed to .01w/cm2-.0035w/cm2 waves”
Some experiments demonstrate Chromosomal aberrations (damage) of living cells induced by microwave radiation and a high incident of Down syndrome human babies when the male parent is exposed to high levels of microwave radiation.
Now, bare in mind the above journal excerpts were just concerned with microwave levels of radiation at a tune of Mega hertz frequencies and are no where near the level of 5G which is at high frequency electromagnetic radiation with Gigahertz such as 2.45 – 6 Ghz/ Giga hertz,  (*Giga hertz *One GHz represents 1 billion cycles per second).   So with over four hundred military papers and experiments funding this research and the overall conclusion being extensive damage can be caused to cell tissue, brain tissue, and organs with just Mega hertz, is it not clearly apparent to scientists, doctors, governments, military and civilians, that Giga hertz is at the level of Military frequency weapons that are clearly extremely harmful to humans and animal life, let alone, the implications of this on weather engineering and the delicate ionosphere and all  ecosystems that will be affected.  At this level the entire ionosphere can be heated up to high radiation levels, also 5G networks can increase  random forest fires and electronic fires with the microwave radiation being highly electrically charged at Giga Herz levels, the environmental risks, impact and implications are being completely negated and are unknown.
 1.4 GHz is 1400 MHz, 5G is using the spectrum in the frequency range (600 MHz to 6 GHz) and also in millimeter wave(mmWave) bands (24–86 GHz).
Over 240 scientists from more than 40 countries have expressed their “serious concerns” regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices already before the additional 5G roll-out. They refer to the fact that ”numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2011 concluded that EMFs of frequencies 30 KHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). However, new studies like the NTP study mentioned above and several epidemiological investigations including the latest studies on mobile phone use and brain cancer risks confirm that RF-EMF radiation is carcinogenic to humans.
The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and Space has now been translated into 30 languages. It has been signed, thus far, by more than124, 000 individuals and more than 1,100 organizations from 203 countries and territories. Beekeepers were recently added due to the increasing scientific and direct observation that RFR and cell towers are injurious to bees. Those signing include:3381 scientists
1,913 medical Doctors
5,848 engineers
3,525 psychologists,psychotherapists and social workers
3,052 nurses  According to The Physicians for the Safety of 5G technology
New research by Neufeld and Kuster 2018  highlights the significant tissue heating generated by 5G technology with rapid short bursts of data transfer on a device, prompting them to call for reevaluation of  thermal safety standards (let alone biological standards). The researchers state, “The results also show that the peak-to-average ratio of 1,000 tolerated by the International Council on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection guidelines may lead to permanent tissue damage after even short exposures, highlighting the importance of revisiting existing exposure guidelines.”   In addition, there is convincing emerging scientific evidence causing great concern for the environment, with harm to mammals, insects and bacteria, prompting scientists around the world to call for a moratorium on 5G.  This 5G technology is complex, likely to be costly, accompanied by privacy concerns and will also consume significant amounts of energy, contrary to global climate goals.  Despite this scientific evidence, the FCC is accelerating the deployment  of wireless antenna infrastructure by limiting local governments ability to refuse these towers, limiting charging fees and shortening the shot clock for approval, effectively blocking the power of local authorities.
Telesat plans to launch 120 satellites, OneWeb’s phase one network will be 648 satellites, and SpaceX are launching over 12,000 satelites for 5G technology, All three networks are expected to reach full operational capacity by the early 2020s .
Carlita Shaw
author of

Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation Volume 1.
The US Army and School of Aerospace Medicine published In September 1974, the results of several hundred sick military experiments on animals which were released as findings in Several Volumes, this is from Volume 1.


Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Professor (assoc) Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden. Present address: The Environment and Research Foundation, Örebro, Sweden, http://www.environmentandcancer.com (lennart.hardell@environmentandcancer.com)

Signatories to Scientists’ 5G AppealLink 

 Published Literature 5G High Frequency, Gigahertz RF



by Carlita Shaw


Surviving Depression in a Depressing World, an Ecological Perspective

Silent Ecocide, a Crisis of Human Consciousness



Leave a Reply